تقارير: ألونسو نافس فليك وأرتيتا على تدريب عملاق أوروبي

وصل تشابي ألونسو لتدريب ريال مدريد الصيف الماضي، وعلى الرغم من ذلك فقد كشفت تقارير جديدة فإنه كان من الممكن أن يتخذ مساره التدريبي اتجاها مختلفا قبل عودته لملعب سانتياجو برنابيو كمدرب.

وبحسب الصحفي “فابريس هاوكينز” فإن تشابي ألونسو مدرب ريال مدريد كان من بين الأسماء المرشحة لتدريب باريس سان جيرمان في عام 2023 عندما كان يحقق نجاحاته مع بايرليفركوزن.

وأضاف أن باريس سان جيرمان وصناع القرار في النادي كانوا يبحثون ويدرسون أسماء العديد من المدربين وملفاتهم الشخصية.

أقرأ أيضاً.. مخاوف في باريس سان جيرمان بسبب لويس إنريكي

وتحدث هاوكينز عن ارتباط عدة أسماء بتدريب باريس سان جيرمان في عام 2023: “وضع المدير الرياضي لويس كامبوس قائمة طويلة جداً، كان أرتيتا أحد المرشحين الأوفر حظاً وكان أيضاً هناك هانز فليك ولويس إنريكي وتشابي ألونسو”.

وأكد الصحفي الفرنسي أيضاً أن باريس سان جيرمان تحرك للعديد من الأسماء المرشحة الأخرى: “كان هناك محادثات مع ناجلسمان، وأرتيتا، وتشابي ألونسو، أراد ألونسو الاستمرار في ليفركوزن وكان يحلم بتدريب ريال مدريد بينما أراد أرتيتا البقاء مع آرسنال”.

وحول قرار باريس سان جيرمان بتفضيل تعيين لويس إنريكي مدرباً جديداً للفريق، اختتم أيضاً: “ما جذب اختيار لويس إنريكي هو شخصيته، إنه شخص يعبر عن رأيه بصراحة، ولا يخشى اتخاذ قرارات صعبة، هناك أيضاً الجانب الرياضي وقصة لويس إنريكي التي أثرت في ناصر الخليفي ولكل هذه الأسباب كان الإسباني هو المدرب المختار”.

Frank’s new Mbeumo: Paratici set to make Spurs bid to sign “world-class” CF

Throughout the years, Tottenham Hotspur supporters have been truly blessed with the chance to watch numerous elite-level attackers feature for the club.

Players such as Heung-min Son, Teddy Sheringham and Harry Kane all managed to make themselves club-legends in North London, with the latter breaking nearly every record in sight.

The 32-year-old currently sits at the top of the Lilywhites’ all-time scoring charts on 280, which saw 208 of his efforts come in the Premier League – with only Alan Shearer scoring more.

However, Spurs’ lack of success on the pitch ultimately led to his departure in 2023, which has left boss Thomas Frank unable to have the chance to work alongside the talisman.

He will no doubt want his own elite-level talent within the final third, potentially landing a player of that calibre during the upcoming January transfer window.

Spurs’ hunt for new attackers in January

Over the last couple of months, Spurs have been just one Premier League side linked with a potential deal for Porto star Sami Aghehowa in the winter window.

The Spaniard has been in tremendous goalscoring form during the early stages of 2025/26, as seen by his remarkable tally of 13 goals in his first 22 appearances across all competitions.

However, the Portuguese outfit don’t want to lose their star man anytime soon, subsequently slapping an €80m (£70m) asking price onto the 21-year-old’s head.

He’s not the only centre-forward in their sights ahead of the upcoming window, with Crystal Palace star Jean-Philippe Mateta another player being considered by Fabio Paratici.

According to one Spanish outlet, the Lilywhites are seriously considering tabling a bid for the Frenchman in January, as his contract talks at Selhurst Park look to have stalled in recent weeks.

It also states that the Eagles may be forced to offload the 28-year-old in the near future to avoid losing him for nothing, with his current deal set to expire in June 2027.

Why Spurs’ latest target would be Frank’s next Mbeumo

During Frank’s time in charge at Brentford before taking the Spurs job, he often had numerous top-level attackers at his disposal, which helped make the Bees an established top-flight club.

The Dane mainly relied on forward Bryan Mbeumo during the latter years of his spell at the GTEC, with the Cameroonian international providing a constant source of goals in the Premier League.

During the 2024/25 season, the 26-year-old netted a career-best 20 league goals, ending the campaign as just one of five players to achieve the feat in the division.

He no doubt thrived under the 52-year-old across the capital, so much so that the manager made a fierce attempt to land his signature after taking the reins in North London.

However, a reunion just wasn’t meant to be, as Mbeumo opted for a move to join Manchester United during the summer, subsequently leading Frank to hunt for a new talisman.

The likes of Mohammed Kudus and Richarlison have often provided the goods in attacking areas for Spurs this campaign, but Frank could get his new star forward with a move for Mateta this winter.

The Palace star has registered 30 goals in the last two full seasons in England’s top-flight, whilst already making huge waves during the first 15 games of the new campaign.

Mateta already has seven goals in 2025/26, but it’s his underlying stats from his outings at Selhurst Park that would make him Frank’s next star attacker in the capital.

The French international, who’s been dubbed “world-class” by one analyst, has registered 1.6 shots on target per 90 this season, which such a tally ranking him in the top 7% of all players in the league.

Jean-Philippe Mateta – PL stats in 25/26

Statistics (per 90)

Tally

Games played

15

Goals scored

7

Shots on target

1.6

Dribbles completed

53%

Crosses completed

75%

Aerials won

2.5

Touches in opposition box

4.1

Recoveries made

3.5

Stats via FotMob

Such a figure showcases his relentless nature in front of goal, handing the Spurs side the constant nuisance and goal threat they have lacked since Kane’s departure.

He’s also completed 53% of his attempted dribbles to date, whilst achieving a 75% cross completion rate – highlighting his all-round nature within the final third.

His biggest asset is his hold-up play, which could allow the Lilywhites to have the needed focal point they’ve craved, with the striker winning 2.5 aerials per 90 so far this season.

It could hand Frank the aerial presence needed to dominate in the 18-yard box, but also an option to help link the play and create intricate moves off a direct ball into the striker.

Whilst he operates in a different role to Mbeumo, the pair have both demonstrated their goalscoring prowess in recent times, with clinical goalscorers often hard to come by in the modern game.

Mateta could provide Frank with exactly what he wants in the January window, with such a move handing the Dane the perfect attacking option to kickstart his career in charge of the Lilywhites.

Their new Son: Spurs have held advanced talks to sign a future £100m player

Tottenham are looking to add fresh quality to their attacking flanks in 2026.

1

By
Angus Sinclair

3 days ago

Better signing than Ekitike: Man Utd submit bid for "world-class" £60m star

Manchester United’s glory days under Sir Alex Ferguson now feel like a distant memory given the slump that they’ve endured over the last couple of seasons.

The Red Devils won 13 Premier League titles during the Scotsman’s reign, helping them win the treble back in the 1998/99 season – a feat that remains remarkable to this day.

However, his side have failed to win the league title since Ferguson’s final year in charge at Old Trafford, with their drought now about to enter its 15th season.

Ruben Amorim is the latest boss to try and end such a wait, but his tenure has yet to lift off after a 15th-place finish after taking the reins back in November last year.

However, the summer transfer window presents an opportunity for the 40-year-old to transform their fortunes, leading to numerous players being touted with a move to the Theatre of Dreams.

The latest on United’s hunt for new signings this summer

Over the last couple of days, Copenhagen winger Roony Bardghji has been touted with a move to United, handing the side an added threat in the final third after scoring against the Red Devils in the Champions League last season.

He’s not the only player on their radar, with Richard Rios emerging as a potential option after impressing for Palmeiras at the ongoing Club World Cup.

However, their ambitions in the market have been evident with their attempts to sign Brentford star Bryan Mbeumo, taking another step in landing the talent, according to one Spanish outlet.

They claim that Amorim’s side have taken the next step in their pursuit, submitting a £60m offer for the 25-year-old after having their opening bid of £55m rejected.

It also states that the hierarchy see him as a key part of their ambitions for the future, which has seen the Cameroonian international agree to a move with the two sides needing to negotiate a fee.

Why United’s £60m target would be a better signing than Ekitike

Despite the interest in other forwards, Eintracht Frankfurt striker Hugo Ekitiké has been another name that has been mentioned as a potential option for Amorim this summer.

Frankfurt striker Hugo Ekitike

The 23-year-old has enjoyed a breakthrough year in the Bundesliga this campaign, registering 22 goals across all competitions, evidently catching the eye of the Red Devils.

However, they’re not alone with Liverpool and Chelsea also in the race to land the Frenchman’s signature ahead of the 2025/26 Premier League campaign.

Any deal for Ekitike’s services would cost the hierarchy a small fortune, given the German outfit are demanding a fee in the region of €100m (£84m) to part ways with their talisman.

Such a fee may not be value for money, with Mbeumo certainly a better option for Amorim’s side in his attempts to bring the glory days back to Old Trafford.

Brentford's BryanMbeumoreacts

He’s set to be available for a cheaper fee this window, whilst also having the experience in England’s top-flight – netting 20 goals this campaign, the best year in his professional career to date.

Mbeumo, who’s been labelled “world-class” by former teammate Pontus Jansson, has outscored the Frenchman and achieved a better goal per shot on target rate – demonstrating his clinical nature despite not being a centre forward.

Games played

38

33

Goals & assists

27

23

Shot on target accuracy

43%

38%

Progressive passes

3.7

1.8

Key passes made

1.9

1.5

Take-on success

47%

43%

Carries into opposition box

2

1.8

Goals per shot on target

0.4

0.3

He’s also achieved a higher tally of progressive passes per 90, along with more key passes, having the ability to provide others around him with the tools to star alongside him.

However, the 25-year-old’s talents don’t end there, completing more take-ons and carries into the penalty area, demonstrating his direct nature with the ball at his feet.

If the offer of £60m is accepted, it would be an excellent piece of business by the hierarchy, handing Amorim the tools he needs for success at Old Trafford.

Whilst Ekitike would be a viable option, the difference in price and experience in such a division makes the Brentford talent a better option ahead of the 2025/26 season.

He'd be perfect for Bruno: Man Utd set to hold talks for "incredible" star

Manchester United could be about to land a star who could take Bruno Fernandes to the next level.

ByEthan Lamb Jun 20, 2025

'Wrong attitude' – Ruben Amorim stance on Alejandro Garnacho backed by Man Utd legend as he insists Argentina winger is 'no superstar'

Manchester United boss Ruben Amorim's handling of Alejandro Garnacho and Marcus Rashford has been supported by a club legend.

Butt supports making winger leaveHe also green-lit Rashford exitEx-midfielder believes coach needs timeFollow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱WHAT HAPPENED?

Amorim decided that Garnacho had to leave United after his fiery post-match interview following the Europa League final defeat by Tottenham, in which he complained about not starting the game and criticised the team's results under their Portuguese coach. Garnacho is nearing a permanent move to Chelsea and former United midfielder Nicky Butt has praised the coach's handling of the situation.

AdvertisementWHAT BUTT SAID

"He's certainly found Garnacho had the wrong attitude, the wrong way of behaving," Butt told GOAL, via BetMGM. "It was only the other day he was getting a tattoo while vaping so he's 100% right with that one. He's got to make sure he cracks down on that one and, you know, Garnacho has done okay, but he's no superstar. He's not some world class player that we're going to lose. He's just a young player that had a good season in a bad team, and you can't behave like that playing from Man United. So I think he's 100% right about that one."

Getty Images SportTHE BIGGER PICTURE

Amorim's decision on Garnacho followed the coach putting his foot down on Rashford's transgressions in December, leading to the England forward heading to Aston Villa on loan and then moving to Barcelona. Butt believes Amorim also played things right with Rashford. He said: "Certain things have been going on with Rashford over two or three years, and sometimes it's time for you to leave the football club and I think that was the case for Marcus. Marcus has been at the club since he was eight years of age and it does come to an end for all of us at some point, there are very few that stay there right through their careers and think it's a good move for him. He went to Villa on loan and did well and now he's gone to a massive football club in Barcelona, and I think he'll kick on there. So that could be the right thing as well. So I think on both occasions Amorim has done the right thing."

DID YOU KNOW?

Butt, who won six Premier League titles at United and was part of the team that won the treble in 1999, also backed Sir Jim Ratcliffe and the other United directors' decision to keep the faith in Amorim even after he presided over the worst season in 51 years. He explained: "I think they had to give him that support. Man United can't keep getting rid of managers. They can't keep blaming these managers that come in, because these managers that come in have got a track record. They're all good. They know what they're doing. They've been there, seen it, and done it. I think probably only Ole hadn't. So you can't keep blaming the managers. I think the bigger thing is, is what the recruitment team was doing over the last 10 years and and how the club had been set up. Hopefully they've sorted that out now they seem to have got a lot of structure within the club now that they've been crying out for." 

Thunder one step away from BBL title as Billings, spinners shine

They’ll meet Hurricanes in title match after restricting Sixers to 151, and chasing the target down in scrappy Challenger

Andrew McGlashan24-Jan-2025

Sam Billings and Nathan McAndrew celebrate victory•Cricket Australia/Getty Images

David Warner will have the chance to lead Sydney Thunder to their first BBL title in nine years, a season after they finished with the wooden spoon, after his side held their nerve in a scrappy Challenger final derby against Sydney Sixers to win by four wickets, with seven balls to spare.The experience of Sam Billings proved vital in the outcome as he nursed Thunder to their target amid a regular loss of wickets. With another 18 runs needed off the remaining 13 balls, Billings broke the tension with a huge leg-side six off Hayden Kerr.Thunder had been excellent in the field, with only a sixth-wicket stand of 56 from 34 balls between Jordan Silk and Ben Dwarshuis hauling Sixers as far as 151. Although Tom Andrews was their only spinner in the wickets – his brace came in the space of three balls – Thunder’s spinners were otherwise again very effective. The ten overs between Andrews, Tanveer Sangha and Chris Green cost just 66 runs on a surface that offered assistance.In reply, young English legspinner Jafer Chohan was very impressive, but Sixers did not have the volume of spin overs they were able to turn to as Thunder set up a final showdown with Hobart Hurricanes on Monday.Jason Sangha opens upThunder have tried a variety of opening combinations this season, although some of it has been out of their hands due to injury to Cameron Bancroft, and a Test call-up for Sam Konstas. For the Challenger, they opted for Jason Sangha, alongside Warner. Jason Sangha was playing in just his second game of the season, and started with a bang by taking 14 runs off the first over.Warner then scooped his first ball from Kerr for six, and Thunder were off to a flyer. But he bunted a catch to mid-on in the third over. Jason Sangha, meanwhile, had reached 30 off 19 balls at the other end, when he slog-swept Chohan to deep midwicket, as the game really started to tighten up.Matthew Gilkes was run-out, although Jack Edwards thought he had broken the stumps with his hands•Cricket Australia/Getty Images

A zing-bail run-outWhen on 3, Thunder’s Matthew Gilkes was given a life as he lofted Ben Manenti’s first ball to long-off, where Lachlan Shaw, who has produced some spectacular fielding in the competition, spilled a regulation catch in front of the Thunder dugout. From there, Gilkes built steadily, including landing a huge six into the Members Stand off Mitch Perry. But Gilkes was then at the centre of a borderline third-umpire decision.Coming back for a second run after playing towards deep third, Gilkes was beaten by a superb throw from Kerr. But Jack Edwards thought he had broken the stumps with his hands. However, after multiple replays, the third umpire Phillip Gillespie ruled that it was the ball that had fully dislodged the bail so Gilkes was ruled out for 26. The stump could be seen moving before the ball made contact, but, crucially, the zing bails had not lit up, so they had not been fully dislodged. Without zing bails, it was unlikely to have been given out.That is when Sixers put the squeeze on. Hugh Weibgen under-edged on to the stumps against Kerr, and Thunder couldn’t find the big over that would likely have killed the game off sooner. Chohan was superb, as he had been in the Qualifier final, and did not concede a boundary until the final delivery of his spell.Thunder held the power surge back until the 18th over, and though George Garton fell swinging across the line, Billings and Nathan McAndrew finished the job with some breathing space.Jordan Silk’s 43 took Sixers to 151•Getty Images

Tanveer’s fortune; Andrews’ doubleAmid the loss of Edwards and Kurtis Patterson inside the powerplay, which ended with Sixers just 23 for 2, it was a struggle for the hosts. Josh Philippe, who had been moved down to No. 3 after having not reached double figures in his last five innings, and Moises Henriques, were starting to engineer a platform when Henriques nailed a return catch to Tanveer, who dropped it, but deflected the ball on to the stumps with Philippe out of his ground.Then Andrews, who has had a huge impact on Thunder’s run to the finals, further dented Sixers’ middle order with two wickets in the 13th over. Firstly, Henriques was brilliant caught at cover by Garton, diving full length to his left. Then Shaw picked out Warner on the off side, with the Thunder captain rewarded for aggressive fielding placement. Somewhat surprisingly, that was Andrews’ last over of the innings.Silk’s forlorn finalsSilk was superb in Hobart on Monday, when he had nearly hauled Sixers over the line with 57. Against Sixers in the Challenger, he had to do another rebuilding job from 76 for 5. He broke the shackles with a sweep for six off Tanveer Sangha, and cleared the rope again in the power surge against Wes Agar.The surge brought 20 runs from the two overs, before Dwarshuis was able to find his range against McAndrew in the 18th over, which cost 19 runs. It gave Sixers something to defend, although it wasn’t quite enough in the end.

Hridoy and Ali put Fortune Barishal in BPL final

They beat Chittagong Kings by nine wickets in the first qualifier

Mohammad Isam03-Feb-2025Fortune Barishal became the first team to reach this season’s BPL final when they swept past Chittagong Kings with a nine-wicket win in the first qualifier. This is the franchise’s third final since the pandemic, having won the trophy last year. They await the winner of the second qualifier on Wednesday, between Khulna Tigers and Chittagong.Mohammad Ali was Barishal’s lynchpin with the ball, the Pakistan seamer taking his maiden five-wicket haul in T20s. Ali, who was playing his first match for Barishal this season, took the third five-wicket haul in this year’s BPL, following Taskin Ahmed and Faheem Ashraf. He also became the first bowler to take four wickets in an over in the BPL.Then it was Towhid Hridoy’s turn to wow the crowd, who had been desperate for some good cricket. Hridoy cracked his first fifty in this BPL campaign, getting Barishal to the target in 17.2 overs.

Mayers’ swingers dupe top-order

Kyle Mayers’ last over in the BPL was a disaster. He gave away 30 runs in the last over bowling to Rangpur Riders’ Nurul Hasan in Sylhet. Having played ten matches in the ILT20, Mayers returned to the BPL with a bang. He removed Khawaja Nafay in the first over, getting his inswinger to zip into the batter’s off-stump. Mayers then had the dangerous Graham Clark caught in the covers in his next over, reducing Chittagong to 14 for 2.Captain Mohammad Mithun and Haider Ali were dismissed as they tried to counterattack, both falling to big shots in the powerplay. Hridoy took a superb catch in the deep to remove Mithun for 1, while Ebadot Hossain cleaned up a swinging Haider in the sixth over.Mohammad Ali was wrecker-in-chief of Chittagong Kings, with figures of 4-0-24-5•Fortune Barishal

Shamim keeps Chittagong in the hunt

The task to recover was a big one but Shamim and Parvez added 77 runs for the fifth wicket. Parvez allowed Shamim to go for the shots, before opening up himself. He struck three fours and two sixes in his run-a-ball 36. Shamim meanwhile kept Chittagong in the contest, with his second fifty in this season’s BPL. Shamim’s nine fours and four sixes included some of his trademark sweeps, cuts and switch hits. One of his sixes was the no-look flick against the veteran offspinner Mahmudullah.

Ali takes four in an over

Till this point, Ali bowled three steady overs, picking up one wicket. Bowling the penultimate over, there was a bit of pressure on him, but Shamim, Chittagong’s last recognised batter, wanted to get on strike too. Ali bowled his back of the hand slower ball to remove Khaled Ahmed, before Shamim’s attempted switch hit found Ebadot at short third. Arafat Sunny and Aliss Al Islam were also undone by Ali’s slower balls, who ended up taking four wickets in the 19th over.

Hridoy anchors Barishal chase

Hridoy and Tamim Iqbal added 55 runs for the opening stand, steadying their 150-run chase in the first nine overs. Tamim fell for 29 off 26 balls, with four boundaries, when Nafay took the catch in the deep off Khaled’s bowling. Dawid Malan was attacking from the word go, which allowed Hridoy to go for the shots. He struck four boundaries and a six when he reached his fifty off 45 balls.

Klaassen shows his class as Kent overpower Middlesex

Muyeye’s fifty closes the contest out to keep quarter-final hopes alive

ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay13-Jul-2025The Kent Spitfires are still in with a shout a Vitality Blast quarter-final place, after they coasted to a seven-wicket win over Middlesex at Canterbury, with 11 balls to spare.Fred Klaassen took 3 for 39 as the visitors were limited to 160 for five from their 20 overs and they needed 68 from Leus Du Plooy to give them something to defend.A blistering opening partnership of 66 between Tawanda Muyeye, who top-scored with 59 and Harry Finch meant Kent always looked favourites and when Finch went for 36, Joe Denly took the Spitfires to the brink with 46, before Sam Billings sealed the win with a six.Middlesex chose to bat first but lost Stevie Eskinazi in the second over when he was bowled off stump by Klaassen.In his next over Klaassen got Ben Geddes for 22, after he slapped him straight to Finch at point, leaving the visitors on 40 for two after the powerplay.Kane Williamson was caught and bowled by Jack Leaning for just six but Leaning’s 10th over went for 14, and allowing Middlesex to reach 68 for three at halfway and Matt Parkinson’s 11th went for 16.There was a lengthy delay while du Plooy was treated for a hand injury, after which Grant Stewart bowled Ryan Higgins middle stump for 19, breaking a partnership worth 68.Klaassen claimed the key wicket of du Plooy when he was caught by Finch near the rope but some late hitting by Joe Cracknell, who finished on 24 not out, and Luke Hollman, who was unbeaten on 14, steered Middlesex to a defensible total.It looked less defensible when openers Finch and Muyeye flayed 59 from the powerplay,Although Zafar Gohar made a breakthrough when he caught and bowled the former for 36, it didn’t affect the scoring rate.A single from Josh Little gave Muyeye his 50 and although Higgins had him caught by du Plooy in the 16th, Billings came in and blasted 20 from seven.Denly was denied the satisfaction of hitting the winning runs when he was bowled by Tom Helm, leaving Billings to complete the job with a six off Higgins that flew over square leg.

Rahul Tewatia and the romance of the struggle

He was 5 off 13. He finished 53 off 31. This innings made you want to believe that the tide can turn. Even in T20s

Sidharth Monga28-Sep-20205:59

Making sense of Tewatia’s ‘freakish’ knock

Among all the content IPL teams produce thanks to their access, “Dressing Room Talks”, Ricky Ponting’s debriefing after any Delhi Capitals game, is absolutely must-see. Players circle around Ponting, who often refers to his big black notebook, and listen to him break down the game. When Capitals win, it is done amid raucous laughter and applause. It is a rare window into how a team works.Ponting also introduced to Capitals a concept of “Change Room Man of the Match” to appreciate the support acts that don’t get spoken about during a match. He hands them badges for their contribution.Ponting debuted this at the start of the 2019 season, which they began with a big win after losing the toss at Wankhede against the winningest IPL team of all. Rishabh Pant had scored a scarcely believable 78 off 27 that night, but Ponting commended Colin Ingram for his 47 off 32 from 29 for 2, Shikhar Dhawan for a forty, and Ishant Sharma, Trent Boult and Kagiso Rabada for their bowling. He said he didn’t care that Axar Patel went for 42 in his three overs because the conditions were unfavorable for spinners. He spoke of the fielding. He called Capitals a “f*cken good” team. He chalked plans for the next day, and then began to walk off.On his way, Rahul Tewatia stopped him. The conversation between the two wasn’t audible because of the noise, but Ponting turned around and patronisingly said, “Boys, Tewatia took four catches, and wants a pat on the back.” To the sound of mocking laughter. And walked off with an even more patronising smirk on his face.Oh the ignominy of being forgotten.A tender coconut in his hand, Axar immediately walked to Tewatia to mock him. “Who begs for recognition, bro?” Axar asked Tewatia in Hindi.”Bro, you have to fight for what you are owed,” Tewatia replied earnestly.

View this post on Instagram

This. Is. New. Delhi. Coach Ricky Ponting out there giving us all the #MotivationalFeels with his speech after the #MIvDC game The boys are ready for #DCvCSK at #QilaKotla! #ThisIsNewDelhi #DelhiCapitals

A post shared by Delhi Capitals (in ) (@delhicapitals) on Mar 26, 2019 at 5:48am PDT

**Tewatia had probably done all that was asked of him that night. He came out to bat with 16 balls remaining in the innings, made sure Pant got the strike for 12 of those, and also hit a six in the four he got. He was taken for 12 by Kieron Pollard in his first over before he took the wicket of the last batsman in his second. In between he took four catches; he had to dive for one, the other three were more regulation.You could see why Ponting didn’t choose him for the honours. More than that you could feel what Tewatia would have gone through that night. He was a proper journeyman. He had played only six first-class games, 18 List A games and 32 T20 ones. And he was about to turn 27. His T20 debut came in the IPL, for Rajasthan Royals in 2014, but he was soon traded to Kings XI Punjab. He next played in the IPL in 2017, only to be traded to Capitals (Daredevils back then) next year.Rahul Tewatia was the centre of attention after his spectacular innings•BCCITewatia would have known he was never going to be the star player. He wasn’t a good enough legspinner to play for his bowling alone, and he hardly got to bat. This was a night he had made contributions in every small window of opportunity he had been given. He was in the midst of possible heroes – Ponting, Sourav Ganguly, his team-mates, including Haryana legspinner Amit Mishra – and would have spent every second of that debriefing hoping to hear his name and the applause and the recognition to go with it.It never came. When he asked for it – not outside but within the team – the derision that did come wasn’t entirely unexpected in a cricket change room full of alpha male egos. Tewatia bowled 38 balls, and batted 22 that season. He was soon traded back to Royals. It was a sensible move. Tewatia wasn’t a finished product, and they didn’t have a slot where they could develop a player.**Tewatia is the kind of player who will not get a lot of opportunity. His legspin is not classic, his batting unproven. It shows in how his home state Haryana struggled to find him a regular spot in their sides. Twenty20 cricket brought cricketers such as Tewatia a chance to build a career. They could super-specialise to such an extent they could get a game for a certain match-up to contain just one batsman. The short duration of the format means you can even afford to waste one player in case you don’t get your desired set-piece. However, when you get that chance, you have to be precise and efficient with executing the skill you have been brought on to execute.Tewatia is also the kind of player who will be more at home at a team with budget constraints so that it is then in their best interest to develop such a player. Apart from being one of those teams, Royals also needed Tewatia’s super specialisation as the only Indian left-hand hitter anywhere near their first XI. Through this trade, Tewatia had come back to his spiritual home.**In his first match back for Royals, Tewatia managed to annoy the biggest fanbase in the IPL. Not only did he take three Chennai Super Kings wickets, he also brought out the “fingers in ears” celebration to mark one of those wickets. Later in the night he posted his photo with fingers in ears on his Instagram page. The comments section was inundated with abuse primarily from CSK fans. Some of them unimaginatively told him of alternate places to stick his fingers, some mockingly asked what noise he was blocking in empty stadiums, but the gist of the abuse was: “We have seen Philippe Coutinho celebrate this way for Barcelona, who are you? A walk-on player in a walk-on team.”The comments section was about to get busy in five days again.**Rahul Tewatia took two wickets in two balls•BCCITwenty20 cricket has freed batsmen up. They actually prepare to hit sixes. Earlier batsmen only used to practise in the nets, which could be claustrophobic. You didn’t quite know and watch for yourself how far you were hitting balls. A Lance Klusener, who would hit just sixes in a training session, was an exception. Now they have intra-squad contests to see who hits more sixes. Royals had one such in their camp to see who hit most sixes in an over. According to Sanju Samson, the six-hitting machine, Tewatia hit four or five sixes in that over.That day onwards, Andrew McDonald, the coach, and Zubin Barucha, the director of cricket, began to work on Tewatia’s batting. A potential move to open the innings had also been considered, according to Samson. The same Samson was reduced to turning down a single with Tewatia at the other end.**In his second match back for Royals, Tewatia’s 31-ball stay at the wicket brought forth the best and worst of T20 cricket the format. Its crunched nature leaves little room for personal struggle. Coaches tell batsmen if they are struggling, chances are others will too, so don’t give up the ghost, but what if your side has scored 100 in nine overs chasing 224 and you, promoted to do a job, are unable to get the ball off the square? It happened, most infamously, to Yuvraj Singh, one of the cleanest strikers cricket has ever seen, in the World T20 final of 2014. It happened to a young Ravindra Jadeja when he was promoted up the order in a 2009 World T20 game. It keeps happening to someone or the other.The essence of sport is to fight through tough situations. The crunched nature of this sport doesn’t allow for it. Those crunching numbers have been egging coaches on to pull back the batsman who is sucking the momentum out of an innings. You have only so many deliveries and 10 wickets to make use of them. Personal struggle is a nicety best left for the nets. The kindest of people wanted Tewatia to commit the less dramatic version of stepping on his wicket: just leave the crease and swing so that you can at least get stumped when you hit. At one point, even Samson asked him to do the same: run down the pitch and hit hard.4:02

Manjrekar, Chopra bat for ‘retired out’ concept

Tewatia didn’t want to. This is where the philosophical essence of sport comes into question. I once goaded Stephen Fleming to say retiring-out people should be normalised. He wouldn’t have any of it. I gave him the example of Yuvraj in the 2014 final. “That’s the beauty of it, isn’t it? Not let someone get away with it just because they can tap out. ‘Not my day today, I am out.'”Fleming has played a lot of international cricket and now coaches a successful T20 franchise. To him, the philosophy was clear: you do not give up the struggle. Tewatia never tapped out. He kept doing the right thing. He kept picking the wrong’uns, kept trying to go over long-off, but kept getting beaten. With every dot and single, the walls kept closing in, the asking rate kept rising, and Samson kept getting frustrated. Imagine the abuse that awaited on his Instagram page.You wonder how Tewatia felt when Samson nearly holed out, playing a frustrated shot because of all the momentum loss. Or when Samson refused to take a single lest Tewatia get back on strike. This is where you saw T20 at its practical best. That match-up – Tewatia against Maxwell – was proving to be the worst, and Samson had just hit two sixes off the same bowler. Ego or pity was taken out of this decision making. “How will Rahul feel if I push him further into the dumps by not taking the one?” No sir, not the time to think that.That also showed how over-rated singles and rotating strike in T20s can be. On the night Kings XI Punjab hit 11 sixes, Royals cleared the ropes 18 times to make up for all the lack of rotation of strike. It happens in 80% of the matches: score more in boundaries, and win the game.The commentators rightly questioned the wisdom of promoting Tewatia on a night when orthodox hitting produced more and easy runs. Cameras kept panning to the dugout and kept showing worried faces. Tewatia kept the noise out. He kept trying to hit that one six to get him going. In the timeout, at 5 off 13, having failed to get the better of the legspinner, Tewatia told his captain, Steven Smith, he was still in it, that he could hit three sixes each of Sheldon Cottrell and Mohammed Shami, international bowlers both. A bemused Smith said, “Mate, that is great self-belief.” Was there some derision in that?In the end, the sensational turnaround – six sixes in the last eight balls Tewatia faced – didn’t prove any of the rationalists wrong. He was perhaps not the right choice to send at No. 4, but you have also got to look at the shallow batting line-up. Stepping on your wicket is perhaps the better solution if an Andre Russell is waiting in the dugout. There is no way this kind of an effort is repeatable. In hindsight, if Kings XI had bowled M Ashwin – remember Tewatia’s struggle against non-turning legspin earlier – instead of Sheldon Cottrell, this might not even have happened in the first place.This innings was not about all that. It transcended tactics. It went into the larger essence of sport. How can you be an elite competitor and just give up? This innings made you want to believe in the romance of the struggle. That the tide can turn. Even in a duration as small as T20 cricket. That tapping out, in life as in sport, is not really the option after all.”You have to fight for what you are owed.”

Road to the T20 World Cup, via IPL 2022: Contenders for India's 15

There are various roles to account for but the selectors have options for each of them. Here’s a run through, with an IPL lens for context

Gaurav Sundararaman21-May-2022

BATTERS
Role 1: Powerplay enforcer
Contenders: Prithvi Shaw and Ishan Kishan
One of the key requirements of a T20 opener is the ability to maximise the powerplay. This is crucial for various reasons: conditions could get tougher for run-scoring later in the innings, and teams often try to slip in a few overs from a weaker bowler up front if the batters are conservative. Not to mention, the powerplay enforcer is critical to taking advantage of fielding restrictions to set a strong foundation and/or bring the asking rate down in a jiffy.

India’s incumbent first-choice openers – Rohit Sharma and KL Rahul – both bat similarly in the powerplay. Across the last three IPLs, Rohit strikes at 127 while Rahul goes at only 114 in the first six. Ruturaj Gaikwad and Shikhar Dhawan also pace their innings in a similar manner. However the game has evolved to require more, and the team cannot afford the predictability of two players with similar approaches opening. Enter the powerplay enforcer, and Prithvi Shaw is the frontrunner for this role. No Indian batter other than Shaw (strike rate 155) has scored at over 135 in the first six over the last three years. On average, he scores 19 off 12 balls in the powerplay. Ishan Kishan and Yashasvi Jaiswal are not at the same level as Shaw yet, but they are batters who could be groomed for this role. The fact that they bat left-handed is an added advantage.Role 2: Anchors/crisis men
Contenders: Rohit Sharma, KL Rahul, Virat Kohli, Ruturaj Gaikwad, Shikhar Dhawan, Shreyas Iyer
Having a powerplay enforcer comes with the amplified risk of losing an early wicket. To balance that out, you might look to go with someone who can do a repair job when needed. Batters like Rohit, Rahul, Virat Kohli, Dhawan, Gaikwad and Shreyas Iyer suit the role of crisis men; they look to bat deep, generally slowly increasing their strike rate. The inherent risk here is getting stuck at a slow tempo and not allowing the power-hitters that follow enough deliveries to do their thing.In the middle overs, Kohli and Iyer strike at 114 and 126 respectively, while Rohit and Rahul go at 132 and 138. If we are to dig deeper and look at spin, which usually constitutes a major chunk of the middle overs, the data is more revealing. Kohli strikes at 105, Rahul at 117, Iyer at 120 and Rohit at 127.Given that most of these batters play multiple formats for India, it is perhaps difficult for them to train specifically for a more attacking role in the middle overs. Keeping this in mind, if we go with the insurance of an anchor or two in the top four, who can take on the role of attacking through the middle overs when needed?Role 3: Spin-hitters/intent machines
Contenders: Sanju Samson, Suryakumar Yadav, Deepak Hooda, Nitish Rana, Rahul TripathiIn the middle overs an ideal candidate has the ability to score boundaries against both pace and spin with the field spread. The aim is to reduce dot balls. In the last three years of T20 cricket, there are four Indian players who have scored at rates of over 130 against both pace and spin in the middle overs: Suryakumar Yadav, Sanju Samson, Rahul Tripathi and Deepak Hooda. At least two of these ideally need to be regulars in the middle order. They are busy players who constantly look to take the bowling on.

Role 4: Finishers
Contenders: Hardik Pandya, Rishabh Pant, Ravindra Jadeja, Dinesh Karthik
Nos. 5-7 require power-hitters who have the ability to tee off from the first ball they face. The likes of Kieron Pollard and Andre Russell have looked to perform this role for more than a decade – and they still fail at it more often than they succeed. The point of entry for these batters ideally depends on the number of balls remaining in the innings. The No. 5 batter sometimes comes in slightly earlier, but Nos. 6 and 7 should ideally come in after the 14th over and tee off immediately.One of the metrics used to measure the effectiveness of a batter at these slots is their strike rate in the first five/ten balls they face. Among Indian batters, Dinesh Karthik, Hardik Pandya and Ravindra Jadeja are the best by this metric, striking at around 150 to start innings over the past two IPL seasons. Since Rishabh Pant bats up the order for his franchise, it is unfair to judge him by the same metric and the numbers would not be in his favour, but it is important that he is assigned this role in the Indian team; he has the ability to attack from the outset. His left-handedness offers additional flexibility in tackling skewed ground dimensions and wristspinners.ESPNcricinfo LtdSPINNERS
Roles 5 and 6: Control artiste, and a wicket-taker
Contenders: R Ashwin, Yuzvendra Chahal, Kuldeep Yadav, Axar Patel, Rahul Chahar, Ravi Bishnoi, Washington SundarThe ideal spin combination for a team is to have a pair whose stock deliveries turn in the opposite direction. Also, one should primarily be a wicket-taker, while the other should consistently offer economy. That helps build bowling partnerships, which are so crucial to a team’s success. Typically, a fingerspinner and a wristspinner tend to form such a combination. At present, R Ashwin and Yuzvendra Chahal for Rajasthan Royals, and Axar Patel and Kuldeep Yadav for Delhi Capitals are good examples of this. While Ashwin, Washington Sundar and Axar control the flow of runs, the likes of Chahal, Kuldeep and Ravi Bishnoi are wicket-takers.

PACE BOWLERS
Role 7: Powerplay specialists
Contenders: Jasprit Bumrah, Bhuvneshwar Kumar, Deepak Chahar, Mohammed Shami, Mohammed Siraj
The aim in this phase is to pick up early wickets, and extract any seam/swing that is available. Ideally the bowler sends down three overs at the start of the innings.There are obvious contenders for this role based on form and consistency. Since IPL 2018, no bowler has taken more powerplay wickets than Deepak Chahar, while no bowler has taken more wickets in the powerplay in all IPL cricket than Bhuvneshwar Kumar.However, if there isn’t much swing available, then Mohammed Shami is a better choice in the powerplay.Chahar, with his added batting ability, could be the front-runner for this role. Jasprit Bumrah could do the job too, but might well be reserved for the next role.Role 8: Death-overs specialists
Contenders: Jasprit Bumrah, Harshal Patel, Avesh Khan, Arshdeep Singh (left-arm), T Natarajan (left-arm)
Similar to the batter coming in in the last few overs of a T20 innings, the art of finishing the innings with the ball is a unique and specialised skill. The ability to bowl several variations and execute the yorker repeatedly – to different styles of batters and in various conditions – are the main criteria for this role. While Bumrah is easily the best at it, Harshal Patel and Arshdeep Singh are not too far behind. Only Bumrah has bowled more yorkers than Arshdeep with one league match left in IPL 2022, but Arshdeep’s economy at the death is the best in the competition so far. Arshdeep also gives the attack the left-arm variation.Role 9: Speed merchants
Contenders: Umran Malik, Mohsin Khan (left-arm), Prasidh Krishna
Speed is useful in certain conditions and against specific oppositions. These bowlers can bowl extremely fast in the middle overs, even – or especially – when conditions are not necessarily favourable for seam and swing. Accuracy is key, of course. While not every team has this luxury, most teams are looking to add one such bowler to their squad. England’s Mark Wood and New Zealand’s Lockie Ferguson are examples. India can groom any of the contenders listed above for the role.ESPNcricinfo LtdALLROUNDERS
Role 10: Multi-dimensional players
Contenders: Hardik Pandya, Ravindra Jadeja, R Ashwin, Washington Sundar, Axar Patel, Deepak Chahar, Shardul Thakur
Finally, players who have multiple skillsets are an asset in any line-up. A bowler who lengthens the batting line-up might be picked over a bowler who might be marginally better at his primary skill but isn’t handy with the bat.A wicketkeeper who is also a powerplay enforcer or a finisher, or a spin/pace-bowling allrounder are examples of players who offer options to the captain. The squad should ideally have at least four multi-dimensional players from the contenders listed above.ESPNcricinfo’s first-choice India 15
ESPNcricinfo Ltd

'Pandemic forced us to do more with even less' – CWI president Ricky Skerritt

Ahead of board elections, Skerritt on the financial hurdles facing cricket in the Caribbean, being a “player-centric president”, and more

George Dobell26-Mar-2021
How perilous were CWI finances when you took over?
I didn’t even know how perilous they were. And I was on the board. There was a fair amount of delusion about a lot of things at CWI and our policy of being transparent, accountable and open has brought about a wider understanding of the challenges CWI really faced. We have been very open about the real difficulties in taking CWI forward because of the obstacles in place and the battles that went on and on. We’ve tried to bring peace and understanding and partnership to really refocus on, as we call it, cricket first.You said there was “black hole” in the finances. What state are CWI’s finances in now?
The biggest problem we were facing is that all of our future cash was spoken for before we even got it. We were living on borrowed future income. So, we had close to USD 20 million in institutional debt. And we were borrowing to pay back lenders. It was all smoke and mirrors. And that’s understandable on short-term strategies when there are difficult times for cash flow. But it had become endemic.So we’ve been having to tighten belts, focus on cash rather than on profit and loss and get rid of any sort of unnecessary costs. And we’ve cut our debt down by at least a third now after less than two years. And, with some difficulty, we have improved our ability to meet our obligations, we just could not meet most of our obligations [previously].We were borrowing money to pay wages. We did that for the first year that I was in office. Right up until the early summer last year we were literally having to borrow to just pay players and staff.What impact did the pandemic have?
The pandemic made everything more devastating. But it also gave us an opportunity and an excuse to focus on what we really needed to focus on, which was keeping CWI going and getting all stakeholders to understand that it would take sacrifices from all of us, including a 50% pay cut for everybody. We said it would either be that or we would have to lay off a significant number of individuals, which we didn’t want to do. In the first year [of Skerritt’s term], we were just tightening up and reducing staff based on attrition as opposed to cutting too much. We were just trying to keep control. We said we would do more with less.The pandemic forced us to do more with even less. And I think that, in the final analysis, we’re going to come out of the pandemic more informed and better aware of what’s needed going forward.There’s been some criticism from within the Caribbean that you should have placed a higher price on West Indies’ involvement in the series in England in 2020. Some say you should have asked the ECB for several million dollars for agreeing to complete that tour. How do you reflect on that now?
First of all, there’s no higher price than the health and safety of our players. And we did everything to ensure that we had a partnership with the ECB, their medical people and their country’s best medical people working with our medical people and our medical advisors to make sure that we establish a pioneering – and I emphasise it pioneering – bio-safety model, which has become the template for all others that have followed. We are very proud to have been a leader in that.The criticism came from people who were upset that we tried to re-introduce cricket because, for them, no cricket was going to be used as a failure of ours. This was about carrying out our obligations to the ICC Future Tours Programme.Ricky Skerritt, the CWI president, pledged to provide greater accountability when running for office•CWIThose folks wanted me to somehow hold a gun to the head of the ECB and extort money from them because there was this perception that if we didn’t go to England, the ECB would go bankrupt. Therefore, they would be prepared to pay any kind of money.That was ridiculously untrue. There were other teams lined up to go to England and I could bet you that none of them are going to do the distasteful action of seeking to extort money for the trip. It just doesn’t happen in ICC systems. There’s absolutely no record of a visiting team being able to extort money from a host. That’s not how the system works.Just ahead of that Test series in England, some were calling for the dismissal of your head coach. What does that tell us?
It is a very sad reality that across the Caribbean not everybody really, genuinely loves West Indies cricket through thick and thin. Some of the people have given many hours of support for West Indies cricket but, when it comes to certain matters of politics, you almost can’t recognise them.So, Phil Simmons was unjustly released from his job, years ago. And Phil Simmons was allowed to reapply for the same job some years later when I became chairman. And somehow, there are people who feel that Phil Simmons gets preferential treatment. Phil Simmons gets success the old fashioned way. He works for it. He has failures, along with his successes, which he learns from, and what we have tried to do in CWI is to develop a learning environment and Phil Simmons is the right man for that. We went through a process, a very transparent recruitment process, to put him in place. So when there were people calling for his removal, it was not only shocking, it was very distasteful. And very worrying. Because it reminds us how vulnerable West Indies cricket is to those critics only see their own shadows ahead of them.What are the achievements you’re most proud of as president?
Enthusiasm for West Indies cricket regionally and globally. The region and the international environment have begun to look at West Indies as a potential force in world cricket.Is there tangible evidence of that?
Well, I can’t give you the data off the top of my head. But the fan engagement, the social media interactions, the conversations that are taking place in the media and the upsurge in interests. Even in the areas of politics – which I prefer wasn’t the focus – but there is just more dialogue. And the more the dialogue takes place the more constructive it will become.One of the obvious changes is that you seem to have all the players available again.
I would say that is the second biggest achievement: bringing back, confidence, within the system at the player level. Players, generally, don’t trust cricket administrators for all kinds of reasons. History is flooded with confrontation between players and the board. So I certainly can’t tell you that there will be no confrontation in the future.Skerritt: ‘I have no apologies about being a player-centric president. I’ve been accused of being too soft to players’•Philip Spooner/CWIWhat I can tell you is that the partnership that my predecessors had set up with the West Indies Players’ Association was a good partnership that has continued to strengthen. But most importantly, the relations with most of the players including many of whom are not members of WIPA, which was at an all-time low, that has stabilised considerably.We just saw a Super50 tournament where the best players collaborated with us to make themselves available to play whether they were contracted or not. Because the players are beginning to understand that there is goodwill. I have no apologies about being a player-centric president. I’ve been accused of being too soft to players. You let me see a cricket system without players. You could have it without administrators; you cannot have it without players.Ultimately administrators – rightly or wrongly – are probably defined by the results on the pitch. The team has remained a bit inconsistent, hasn’t it?
Yes, very much so. And let me say, at no time did we predict that within two years, we would see the sustainability in improvement. And I certainly understand that, ultimately, we will be measured by improvement on the field. But remember where we started from: we started from the bottom. In every format. So, what we have to ask ourselves is: how did we get there?Then we have to make sure that we eliminate all of the problems that have caused us to be there. And put in place the measures that will help us to climb the ladder again, including selection of the best available players. But more importantly, helping all of the players to improve so that they go from one tournament to the next as an improved player. We haven’t done a very good job of that in the past.How confident are you that you’re putting the blocks in place to build for the future?
We’ve been putting the human infrastructure and the technical and technological networks in place. In fact, since October last year, there is more collaboration taking place between coaches, all across the region, than ever in our history.We have right now, without being able to host tournaments as we would want, been able to identify 45 U-19 players who are already receiving virtual and actual coaching assistance no matter where they live in the Caribbean. It’s part of our development plan to get that U-19 team ready for the World Cup, which we will be hosting in a year’s time.Look at what we did with the women’s programme. Not only did we put Courtney Walsh in charge of it, but we have significantly improved the quality of the coaching team he has around him. And the very first cricket activity of this year, starting early in January and running for three-and-a-half weeks, was a high performance camp for 26 women of all ages and backgrounds helping to get us started on a new wave of preparation for the next Women’s World Cup.Courtney Walsh has joined the West Indies women’s team support staff•CWIIn terms of the Wehby report, while the aim might be to bring in more independence and expertise, some in the territorial boards will say that you’re minimising their voices. Is it realistic to expect them to vote themselves out of existence?
That’s the million-dollar question. How many of us will be big enough to see that West Indies is cricket is bigger than us individually? It’s the most difficult thing.It’s not difficult for me. I could leave West Indies cricket at any time and still have West Indies cricket completely warm in my embrace. I’d still do whatever I can at any level. But there are some people who are so personal about their particular role and position that anything that threatens that, threatens their support for all things West Indies cricket.All of these people are well-intentioned, ultimately. Cricket volunteers are not always easy to find. Cricket, in the past was run primarily by volunteers. By people who have been doing it for decades. And they get threatened by these folks who come in and don’t even know or understand the history. It becomes a potential conflict every time a new person comes in and tries to assert him or herself.They never seem to want to accept people who didn’t come through the belly of West Indies cricket; the local boards and territorial boards. There are some people who are petrified about the possibility of university professors or engineers and doctors who somehow never played enough cricket or didn’t come through the board system, coming on to the board. That’s why we have independent directors. That’s what it’s about: how do you get a balance between the cricket people and those that know how to take that and make it work for cricket.It would appear the CWI relationship with various stakeholders – CARICOM, for example – has improved. And you were close to becoming vice-chair of the ICC board and are now on the MCC Cricket Committee. What do we read into this?
The vice-chairmanship of ICC is an important role, but it’s primarily a ceremonial role. It’s there as a safety net to cover for chairman. I was asked if I was nominated if I would accept the nomination and I said sure. We need to have democracy in these organisations and people need to believe that there are others who are competing. That’s why I welcome competition in this election. But, the fact that, with very little effort, I was beaten by one vote. It said two things: one that the ICC board is clearly divided, which we were not that surprised at, but it also said that in a short time that I have been on the board, a fair number of people believe that I have potential for helping in the leadership of ICC. I’m very honoured by that perception.Could this improved relationship with the ICC lead to West Indies hosting major ICC events?
Very hopefully. Even though there’s still some division and distrust, Greg [Barclay], the new chairman, has come in with a great sense of expectation and I think that there’s a fair amount of goodwill towards his leadership. Once a little time elapses you will see some good possibilities coming out of Greg’s chairmanship at the ICC.Is that revenue model idea – an idea which your chief executive [Johnny Grave] originally devised – whereby the host nation share perhaps 20% of their revenue from a the relevant broadcast deal with the visitors, is that still alive?
Everything is alive right now. Everything is on the table right now. And what I think is happening already, is the ICC chair is ensuring that inputs like this will be given an opportunity to come through to the board. His style is to ensure that we get a sort of bottom-up input into decision-making, so it’s not just the [ICC] board deciding on everything. He is insisting that the chief executives’ committee be allowed to put their recommendations to the ICC executive. So Johnny’s paper, which was done a few years ago, is being updated as we speak.Is there one message you would like to give to people in the region and in particular, those who will be voting in this election?
We are confident that we have helped cricket West Indies onto the right track. And we need to stay on track. We need to move forward. From time to time, we might have to move sideways. But we don’t want to go backwards. We have to be very careful because of the delicate vulnerability of what we have achieved for just a short while, that it can go off track very easily.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus